Contact us

In the course of approaching companies and telling them about the services provided by the ASM Plus Workplace, Employment and Investigation team I not infrequently find myself receiving the same type of “in denial” response.  The jist of the not infrequent response is that although the concept of the workplace dispute is not unheard of, it doesn’t happen “here”.

In some instances, it may be true that at least at the point of enquiry one organisation or another may not have “any disputes” or there may be effective mechanisms in place to resolve them informally, cost effectively and without rancour.  However, as the recent ground-breaking ACAS report clearly confirms, instances of “no disputes” or “summary and effective dispute resolution” are probably the exception rather than the norm.

Until now, getting hold of clear, persuasive data to counter protestations of the “no workplace related disputes here” has been difficult.  Including as it does the following very pertinent eye-opening statistics, the ACAS report changes all that. For instance:

  • An estimation that 9.7 million employees experienced [workplace] conflict in 2018 to 2019.
  • On average 485,800 employees resign each year as a result of conflict. The cost of recruiting replacement employees amounts to £2.6 billion each year whilst the cost to employers of lost output as new employees get themselves up to speed amounts to £12.2 billion, an overall estimate of £14.9 billion each year. A further 874,000 employees are estimated to take sickness absence each year as a result of conflict, at an estimated cost to their organisations of £2.2 billion.
  • The vast majority of those who suffer from stress, anxiety and/or depression due to conflict continue to work. This ‘presenteeism’ has a negative impact on productivity with an annual cost estimated between £590 million and £2.3 billion.
  • 1 in 5 employees take no action in response to the conflict in which they are involved, while around one-quarter discuss the issue with the other person involved in the conflict. Just over half of all employees discuss the matter with their manager, HR or union representative. In total, informal discussions cost UK organisations an estimated £231 million each year.
  • The largest proportion of the costs of conflict are connected to an ending of the employment relationship – either through resignation or dismissal. Costs in the early stages of conflict are relatively low – these start to mount if employees continue to work while ill and/or take time off work through sickness absence. The use of formal processes pushes costs higher but costs escalate very quickly as soon as employees either resign or are dismissed.
  • This analysis estimates the overall total annual cost of conflict to employers (including management and resolution) at £28.5 billion.

The ACAS estimate amounts to an average of just over £1,000 for every employee in the UK each year, and just under £3,000 annually for each individual involved in conflict. It points to a clear link between the wellbeing of employees and organisational effectiveness.

This unequivocal, well presented and powerful report makes it abundantly clear that employers who are “in denial” about workplace disputes no longer have anywhere to hide and may be very unwise to blandly assume that it only happens to other people.

However, notwithstanding these very pertinent statistics the report strikes many positive notes and amongst its recommendations, includes the following highly significant recommendation:

“Organisations need to place much greater emphasis on repairing employment relationships in the event of conflict and taking action at early points to address issues of capability and poor performance. In addition, the analysis provides support for approaches to disciplinary issues that focus on learning and avoiding blame. However, to achieve this, managers need to be provided with the core people skills to have quality interactions with their staff.”

In some instances, individual organisation will feel able to address these recommendations internally and they will have the expertise and resources to do so.  Others will lack both the requisite expertise and the necessary internal resources and with the above-mentioned statistics very firmly in mind will need to outside help.  In this regard the highly accomplished ASM Plus workplace, employment and organisational team offers a number of cost-effective services:

  • An independent and confidential mediation service
  • The alternative of a facilitated meeting
  • A training, coaching and consultancy advice
  • An independent and confidential investigation service

Our considerable experience tells us that individual members of internal HR departments are often very capable and quite frequently will be well placed to address workplace disputes and disagreements. However, in some instances they may be perceived of as not being sufficiently objective and independent.  This means that possibly mistrustful parties to workplace disputes whether employers, directors, managers, supervisors or employees may not feel able to open up and be as candid and frank as they should be.  Equally, because invariably HR input is not truly confidential, people are often very wary about making statements that will be recorded and may in one sense or another “be used against them” whether contemporaneously or at some later date.

The services offered by ASM Plus mediators are completely neutral and independent. Because we are efficient and respond promptly our charges are modest. Above all ASM Plus has a highly talented and highly experienced team and as our associates’ track records amply demonstrate we have the skill and expertise to help clients resolve disciplinary issues, to improve staff performance and to save employers and employees alike   from being part of the annual £28.5 billion statistic.

Contact us